Skip to content

News · Police, fire and courts · Howard County · Kokomo · Indiana

Kokomo officer charged over 18 Flock searches

Investigators say a Kokomo police officer was charged after 18 searches of a private vehicle in the Flock system.

Kokomo officer charged over 18 Flock searches

Key takeaways

  • A Kokomo police officer was charged.
  • Investigators identified 18 searches of a private vehicle.
  • The searches involved the Flock system.
  • The specific charge and officer’s name are not identified here.

## What happened A Kokomo police officer has been charged in connection with 18 searches of a private vehicle in the Flock system, investigators said. Flock is a system used to search records from vehicle-reading cameras.

The development involves the officer’s searches of information tied to one private vehicle. The charge and the number of searches are the central facts publicly identified in the report.

## What is not yet clear The specific criminal charge, the date of the searches, and the name of the officer have not been identified here. The available account also does not state whether the searches were authorized, what investigators allege the officer’s purpose was, or whether the officer has entered a plea.

Those details matter because a charge is an allegation, not a finding of guilt. Any court record or statement from Kokomo police, prosecutors or the officer’s attorney would add information about the case.

## The system involved Flock systems use vehicle information to help law enforcement search for cars. In this case, investigators focused on 18 searches involving a private vehicle. The report does not establish whether the searches produced any investigative lead or whether anyone else had access to the searches.

WRTV reported the charge and the 18 searches. The linked report is the source cited for this initial account: WRTV report.

What to watch

  • The specific charge listed in court records.
  • Any plea or other court action.
  • Statements from Kokomo police, prosecutors or the officer’s attorney.

Was this useful?

Related stories