
News · Riverside County · Riverside · California
California Supreme Court orders return of 650,000 ballots
Police, fire and courtsThe court ordered the Riverside sheriff to return 650,000 ballots that had been seized.
News · Police, fire and courts · Shasta County · Shasta · California
A UCLA group is urging the Shasta County grand jury to consider removing Clerk Clint Curtis.

Key takeaways
A UCLA group is urging the Shasta County grand jury to consider removing Shasta County Clerk Clint Curtis. The request places Curtis’s position before the county’s grand jury for consideration.
The group’s request is the central development identified in the announcement. It does not itself remove Curtis from office. The wording calls on the grand jury to consider removal, rather than stating that the grand jury has made a decision.
Clint Curtis is identified as the Shasta County clerk. The request comes from a UCLA group and is directed to the Shasta County grand jury.
No decision by the grand jury is identified. The announcement also does not establish that Curtis has been removed, suspended or replaced.
The next step is whether the Shasta County grand jury considers the request and, if so, whether it takes any action. Any decision about Curtis’s position would be separate from the UCLA group’s call for consideration.
The development concerns the office of Shasta County clerk and the county grand jury. Further action by the grand jury would determine whether the matter moves beyond the request described here.
What to watch
Was this useful?

News · Riverside County · Riverside · California
The court ordered the Riverside sheriff to return 650,000 ballots that had been seized.

News · Winnebago County · Winnebago · Illinois
A Winnebago County woman was arrested after allegedly stalking and threatening her former husband.

News · Tuscaloosa County · Tuscaloosa · Alabama
Tuscaloosa police charged a man accused of looking into windows and violating Alabama’s sex-offender law.

News · Whiteside County · Illinois
A headline refers to searches involving a Whiteside County deputy, but it does not identify the deputy, agency, date or records involved.